Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5328 14
Original file (NR5328 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7015, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

JSR :
Docket No. NR5328-14

TT RAR ee et OA
ee YALL AVL

'. From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

  

To: secretary of the Navy
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

 

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 21 Mar 14 w/attachments
(2) HOMC MIO memos dtd 3 Nov 14 and 6 Jan 15
(3) Subject's naval record

i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the service record page 11
(“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entry dated 29 March 2010
{copy at Tab A).

2. The Board, consisting of Mses. Davis, Trucco and Wilcher,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12
March 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the
Headquarters Marine Corps office with cognizance over the
subject matter of Petitioner’s case has commented to the effect
that the request has merit and warrants partial relief,

Adel
specifically, changing “(20 lbs. over your max wt)” to “(16 lbs.
over your max wt) .”

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the
Board finds the existence of an error warranting the following

limited corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by modifying
as follows the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks
(1070)") entry dated 29 March 2010: Change “(20 lbs. over your
max wt)” to “(16 lbs. over your max wt).”

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c. That the remainder of Petitioner’s request be denied.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the

foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6{e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 {e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5737 14

    Original file (NR5737 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No. NR5737-14 29 January 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy subj: EE osc, oo a REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (ay 16 0.8

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03039 12

    Original file (03039 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”") entry dated 10 November 2010, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gorenflo, Grover and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2012, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01263-01

    Original file (01263-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 lb (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) entry dated 23 February 2000. The Automated n Since your request to remove the Page 11 entry does not 3. fall under the purview of this Headquarters, your case will be forwarded to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) for resolution 0 to that agency a lease direct further inquiries HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS DEPARTMENT OF THE 3280 RUSSELL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04627-10

    Original file (04627-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 October 2007 to 2 May 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. Petitioner further requested removing the service record page llc (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 5 February and 4 March 2008. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05034-03

    Original file (05034-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 lb ("Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 8 November 2000. application with supporting documents 2. As stated in paragraph 2 above, counseling is a leadership tool commanders have to improve their Marines' performance, however, Sergea that was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03527-02

    Original file (03527-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be (MCTFS) entry reflecting his corrected by removing the Marine Corps Total Force System placement on weight control from 15 January to 5 May 1997. + ,y ,y i -* MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF GUNNERY USMC SERGEANT Encl: ( 1 )...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6393 14

    Original file (NR6393 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    damarv 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a} 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 20 September 2012 {copy at Tab #). The Board, fe sens sions of error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3747 14

    Original file (NR3747 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 10 May 2011 (copy at Tab A}. The Board, consisting of Ms. Trucco and Messrs. Chapman and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2014, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07418 12

    Original file (07418 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 2 April 2004, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gorenflo, Grover and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2012, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03744-10

    Original file (03744-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ° ue : BUG Docket No: 3744-10 22 April 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub] :